Taxation and Economic Reform in America, A Historical Archive 1789-2009, a new library in the Hein Online database, is now available!
Loads of legislative histories. Check it out by going to http://www.ggu.edu/lawlibrary/virtual/online_resources, scroll down and click on Hein Online.
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Rules For Using the Law Library Reference Desk
Courtesy of Nova Southeastern University blog, Novalawcity:
http://nsulaw.typepad.com/novalawcity/2009/08/rules-for-using-law-library-reference.html
http://nsulaw.typepad.com/novalawcity/2009/08/rules-for-using-law-library-reference.html
Monday, August 3, 2009
Updates to the CCH Databases
CCH has migrated to a new platform, and all of our subscribed databases are accessible via one window. Click on any CCH database link here to access Omnitax, the Pension library, and Business and Finance networks. Please contact any reference librarian if you have a question about using the databases.
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
ACLU Report on Judge Sotomayor
The ACLU has published an 88-page report "on the Nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court."
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
"Students Aren't Customers; Education Is Not a Commodity"
Interesting article by William Astore about the state of higher education: "Students Aren't Customers; Education Is Not a Commodity."
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
SPECIAL NOTICE ABOUT THE LEGAL DATABASES
Due to security issues, ALL LEGAL DATABASES now require users to login with their last name and GGU Law ID number. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Friday, April 24, 2009
Don't cite to Wikipedia!
Reported from http://legalresearchplus.com/ . . .
Case reversed for allowing Wikipedia entry as evidence
By Paul LomioFrom the Examiner.com
Bergen judge reversed for allowing Wikipedia entry as evidence
North Jersey Crime Examiner
A Bergen County judge mistakenly let a collection company lawyer cover a gap in evidence against a credit-card holder by using a Wikipedia page, a state appeals court has ruled.
. . .
“Such a malleable source of information is inherently unreliable and clearly not one whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned,” they added.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)